The Supreme Court takes another step away from Church teaching
There is utter clarity about Catholic teaching on the withdrawal of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration from a patient to bring about death: it constitutes an act of euthanasia.
Pope St John Paul II was uncompromising on this point. In an address in 2004 he told a conference on treating patients in a vegetative state that the withdrawal of nutrition and hydration, “if done knowingly and willingly” to end the life of a patient, represents “true and proper euthanasia by omission”.
Even before that time our own bishops were speaking against the practice, having witnessed a steady erosion of medical ethics after the law lords reclassified nutrition and hydration as a form of treatment in 1993 so doctors could end the life of Tony Bland, a victim of the Hillsborough disaster.
The Bland judgment marked the crossing of the Rubicon. It was followed by government-backed guidance on treatment withdrawal by the British Medical Association, from the General Medical Council, and finally the Mental Capacity Act of 2005.
End-of-life care involving the withdrawal of food and water was codified into the Liverpool Care Pathway and other protocols and rolled out across the country via financial incentives for creaking NHS trusts.
How to continue reading…
This article appears in the Catholic Herald magazine - to read it in full subscribe to our digital edition from just 30p a week
The Catholic Herald is your essential weekly guide to the Catholic world; latest news, incisive opinion, expert analysis and spiritual reflection